For trading-card-game judges

Rule fromthe rules.

The rule sections that decide a call — grouped, cited, and in the official documents’ own words. The written ruling comes under them, never instead of them.

Judge!
How does Raid work?What does Sentinel do?When does a Bounty trigger?What’s the penalty for slow play?A player is 10 minutes late for round 1. What penalty?A player has marked sleeves. What do I do?Can I control two copies of the same unique unit?A player wants to appeal my ruling. What’s the process?Walk me through the steps of an attack.

Worked examples: questions players actually asked on r/Riftbound, each showing what AutoJudge returns — the rule sections that decide it, grouped and annotated, with the written ruling underneath. Section numbers and rulings are the ones those threads settled on.

The budget is three seconds.

A judge standing at a table does not have time to audit a paragraph somebody else wrote. Reading the five sections that decide it is faster — so that is what comes back first.

01

Ask in plain words

Card names come out of the sentence — type en garde and eclipse mid-question and both cards attach, misspellings included. Nothing fires while you type; detection runs when you send.

02

Read the rules that decide it

Grouped, in reading order, each with a line on what it tells you — and the two or three that actually settle it sorted to the top, where you hit them first. Every section opens to the document’s own words in place.

03

The ruling comes under them

One declarative sentence, then the reasoning as bullets that each carry a citation. It is written from exactly the sections on your screen, so it can never cite a rule you were not shown.

The guarantee

It can only cite what it showed you.

The reading list and the ruling come out of one retrieval, on one request. A citation naming a section the model was not given is dropped before it reaches you. Tap any number and the section opens whole — with its version, its effective date and a link to the official PDF, never truncated.

Per-card rulings from the publishers’ own APIs are deliberately not ingested. They are unvetted third-party text, and trusting them would undercut the citation guarantee.

002Golden Rule

[ THE SECTION’S OWN WORDS — served from the ingested PDF at runtime ]


Riftbound Core Rules · vRUP4 · eff. 2026-07-16
When it can’t

It says so.

A judge who cannot tell a real answer from a confident one has gained nothing. A question the documents do not cover returns one fixed line, and no ruling at all.

Which starter deck is the strongest one to buy as a new player?

Nothing in this game’s documents bears on that question. Nothing was retrieved, so there is nothing to rule from.


Ruling

Not covered by the sections available.

Ingested today

Rule from the rules.

Pick a game, ask in plain words, read what decides it.

Open AutoJudge

AutoJudge is an aid. The official documents are always authoritative.

AutoJudgeSend feedback